home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 8053 
 Michiel van der Vlist to mark lewis 
 This echo 
 16 Jan 22 16:22:11 
 
TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0100
CHRS: CP850 2
MSGID: 2:280/5555 61e43c19
REPLY: 1:3634/12.73 61e2f1ed
Hello mark,

On Saturday January 15 2022 11:10, you wrote to me:

 WD>>>> Janis went completely off-line ... if we can't mail her,
 WD>>>> neither can you.

 ml>>> yes you can...
       ^^^^^^^^^^^^
So here you claim that we can e-mail Janis.

 ml>>>  she has a gmail account or didn't you know about that?

 MV>> Why should we know about that?

 ml> if you were one of those that might have a need to contact her outside
 ml> of fidonet, then she would have given it to you...

And here you claim I can only e-mail her if she gave that e-mail address to
me. Well, she didn't. And it works both ways, I see no need for her to contact
me oustide Fidonet so I did not give her my e-mail address.

So you say I can not e-mail her. So out of the windows goes your original
claim that I can e-mail her.

Not that I want or need to. I am not going to e-mail Janis. Because I see no
reason, It is Sean that claims he got an e-mail from Janis. The burden of
proof is on him.

Now that I have your attention... For the sake of argument and only for the
sake of argument, I have not, nor did I have any intention of actually do
this, assume that I had beaten Sean to it.

Suppose that *I* had posted a message in here claiming the position of
moderator of this echo and the position of the editor of the Gazette. Suppose
*I* had posted rules stating among other things that EP1 is in force here and
that no echolist is accepted as authoritive regarding who is moderator and
what are the rules. Suppose *I* had followed up with postings telling
participants that their postings are off topic and to take it elsewhere.

How would you (and Sean) respond to that? Would it be acceptable to you? Would
you comply with my rulings?


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 15/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340
SEEN-BY: 123/131 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 200 307 317 424 426 664 700 240/5832 249/206
SEEN-BY: 249/400 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/789 854 8125
SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/234 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 410/9 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5019/40
SEEN-BY: 5053/58
PATH: 280/5555 464 292/854 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca