TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0100
CHRS: CP850 2
MSGID: 2:280/5555 61e49ba5
REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet f87bb90d
Hello August,

On Sunday January 16 2022 12:59, you wrote to me:

 M>> This is not a court of law, there is no plaintiff. This is
 M>> a discussion area where someone made a claim. The burden of
 M>> proof is always on the one making the claim.

 AA> Maybe plaintiff or claim doesn't translate well in your native
 AA> language..  dunno. :/

Or maybe it doesn't translate well into YOUR native language? Neither of us is
a native English speaker, but I have lived and worked in an English speaking
country.

 AA> Nevertheless, it doesn't matter. Sean merely made a
 AA> statement/announcement of new moderatorship, but he doesn't have
 AA> release phone records or email records to the general public like you
 AA> are suggesting.

Sean claimed that he had received a netmail from Janis. The burden of proof
for that claim is on him.

 AA> The proof in the legit hand-over is in the successful elisting. Sean
 AA> wouldn't be able to do that unless Janis provided the password.   ;)

Sorry, the history of Fidonet has many examples of faul play. That he managed
to get a password for an e-list means nothing to me. E-lists are not
recognised as authoritive in these matters in most parts of Fidonet anyway.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 15/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340
SEEN-BY: 123/131 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 200 307 317 424 426 664 700 240/5832 249/206
SEEN-BY: 249/400 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/789 854 8125
SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/234 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 410/9 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5019/40
SEEN-BY: 5053/58
PATH: 280/5555 464 292/854 229/426