Hiya Nick..

-=> Accession wrote to Bill McGarrity on 03-04-17 06:29 <=-


 Ac> On Fri Mar 03 2017 21:10:20, Bill McGarrity wrote to Digital Man:

 BM> I know I'm being a pest lately but one quick question.  Is there a
 BM> switch or an entry in sbbsecho.ini that will relay incoming routed
 BM> netmail from a downlink meant for another downlink to go through the
 BM> HUB. It seems I have one stuck in in ../sbbs/netmail folder bound for
 BM> another address.

 Ac> If there is no link information for that address, and no route
 Ac> information (whether it be a wildcard or direct), it will not go
 Ac> anywhere. For example, if you receive a routed netmail for 123:456/789,
 Ac> you would either have to have a direct link setup for that node, or a
 Ac> wildcard (ie: 123:ALL routed to 123:1/1).

I have a direct link setup in echocfg to all my downlinks.  The netmail came in
from 24:110/1 and was addressed to me at 24:100/1.  The HUB has both addresses
as linked nodes.

 Ac> Take a look at the destination address of the netmail stuck in your
 Ac> netmail folder, and make sure you have it routed somewhere, or if you
 Ac> have a direct connection to it, that there be a direct setup for that
 Ac> specific address.

 Ac> If it's a point, and you have a direct link setup with the boss node,
 Ac> you have to change that direct link to the boss node to actually route
 Ac> the points under it to it also.

It's not a point. 


--

Bill

Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:81
FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


... Look Twice... Save a Life!!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
 * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)