home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 1975 
 Wilfred van Velzen to Tommi Koivula 
 Re: test 
 31 Dec 22 14:08:54 
 
TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.19-B20221229
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0100
CHRS: UTF-8 2
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
MSGID: 2:280/464 63b03533
REPLY: 2:280/464 63b00bfa
Hi Tommi,

On 2022-12-31 11:15:06, I wrote to you:

 TK>>> It seems that FMAIL is removing the kludge. I'm not joking. The
 TK>>> kludge is there in JAM base before 'fmail scan'.

 TK>> FMail also changes the order of kludges when scanning.

 TK>> ===
 TK>> MSGID: 2:221/6.600 63b001e0
 TK>> PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20221231
 TK>> CHRS: CP437 2
 TK>> TZUTC: 0200
 TK>> ===
 TK>> TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20
 TK>> CHRS: CP437 2
 TK>> PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20221231
 TK>> MSGID: 2:221/6.600 63b001e0
 TK>> ===

 WvV> I'd like to investigate your jam messagebase files for a test area, from
 WvV> before and after the scan.

I investigated the before and after jam message base you sent me. Except for
the Snt flag, FMail doesn't seem to touch the message. When I look at the
messages with GoldED they are identical including the order of the kludges...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.19-B20221229
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/0 16/0 19/37 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340
SEEN-BY: 123/130 131 124/5016 129/305 142/104 153/757 7715 154/10
SEEN-BY: 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 229/110 111 112 113 114 206 307
SEEN-BY: 229/317 424 426 428 470 550 664 700 240/1120 5411 5832 5853
SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31
SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/119 219 319 2119 322/0 757 326/101 341/66 234 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2454/119
PATH: 280/464 240/5832 320/219 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca