Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1980  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Tommi Koivula  |
|  Re: test  |
|  31 Dec 22 15:30:38  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.19-B20221229 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 63b048bd REPLY: 2:280/464 63b035e9 Hi Tommi, On 2022-12-31 14:14:40, I wrote to you: TK>> But I made some research with GoldED's JAM hexdumps. There are two TK>> ways to store the TZUTC in JAM. TK>> 02004 [ 4]: "0200" smapinntpd & gecho TK>> 02000 [ 11]: "TZUTC: 0200" jamnntpd & golded TK>> Maybe there is the reason why FMail strips the TZUTC when exporting? WvV> That rings a bell. But I have to investigate... Found it! That special jam subfield 2004 is ignored by FMail. Apparently it is hardly ever used by software. Because it was in FMail like this from the start, a few decades ago. Golded knows how to handle it when encountered, but doesn't use it when creating new messages in the jambase... It should be an easy fix, but it will have to wait until next year. ;-) Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.19-B20221229 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/0 16/0 19/37 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340 SEEN-BY: 123/130 131 124/5016 129/305 142/104 153/757 7715 154/10 SEEN-BY: 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 229/110 111 112 113 114 206 307 SEEN-BY: 229/317 424 426 428 470 550 664 700 240/1120 5411 5832 5853 SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/119 219 319 2119 322/0 757 326/101 341/66 234 342/200 SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2454/119 PATH: 280/464 240/5832 320/219 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]