Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2060  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Jason Bock  |
|  Re: Issues running a FMailW32 scan  |
|  19 Jul 23 13:49:29  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 64b7d126 Hi Jason, On 2023-07-18 12:35:49, you wrote to me: JB> I use ProBoard v2.30-A1u4 (Alpha), Internet Rex and now FMail. ;) Internet Rex is not the best choice if you just use it for binkp connectivity. It's abandon-ware... JB> My next step is to get netmail to import, but I believe currently it JB> only supports Hudon, right? If so, is there any timeframe for JAM JB> support? There is no time frame for that. Do you really need it? Or is it just nice to have? JB> Since FMail is tossing/scanning well, I have a couple questions. JB> Is there any possibility that FMail will support Squish or *.MSG formats JB> coming to/from packets? There probably will not be Squish support. FMail already uses *.msg format for netmails to and from .pkt's, but not for echomail. Is that what you are asking for? JB> If I sent you ProBoard file structures, could there be tighter integration JB> with ProBoard? There already is the auto export function that supports ProBoard in FMail/FConfig. I haven't checked what exactly that does. But what more would you need? Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 123/131 SEEN-BY: 124/5016 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 SEEN-BY: 218/215 700 720 840 860 880 900 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 307 317 426 428 470 550 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/854 SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 PATH: 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]