Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2089  |
|  Michiel van der Vlist to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  Fmail Compression and Decompression  |
|  21 Aug 23 14:45:17  |
 TID: FMail-W32 2.2.0.0 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: CP850 2 MSGID: 2:280/5555 64e35f8e REPLY: 2:280/464 64e323ff Hello Wilfred, On Monday August 21 2023 10:40, you wrote to me: WV>>> I'm still using rar on two links. MvdV>> Why? They do not support ZIP? WV> Because I can. ;-) Bad argument. WV> At the time the choice was made, because rar compressed better. And WV> because it still works there is no reason to change this. It is no secret that I am not a member of the "more is better" club. In the POTS age with high cost of data transport "compressed better" was a valid argument. Although even then in the end of the compression evolution the added value was so small that it didn't really matter anymore. Is another one percent of compression efficiency realy worth it. In the age of FOIP it has become irrelevant. In addition to thet the trend is to not have mailer/tossers just process uncompressed packets and let binkd do any compression. WV>>> And lha is in use in AmigaNet, because it was and still is the WV>>> default archiver for the Amiga. MvdV>> How many in Amiganet still actually use an Amiga? WV> Enough... Enough to lkep LAH alive? MvdV>> Hoe many of those do not also have a Fidonet node and support MvdV>> ZIP? ZIP has become de de facto compression standard in MvdV>> Fidonet. MvdV>> The problem with keeping all these antiquaria, is that you also MvdV>> have to support it. This will become increasingly difficult MvdV>> when the knowledge evaporates... WV> This is true for all of Fidonet technology. Keeping this old WV> techniques working is partly what makes it interesting... True but at some point one has to make choices that every museum has to make. What do we keep and what do we drop? I see little value in keeping more then one compression method alive for Fidonet. Yes, it is interesting to keep Fidonet alive. But not ALL of the technology that was ever used. Drop some and focus on keeping the rest alive. Cheers, Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303 * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555) SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 123/131 SEEN-BY: 124/5016 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 SEEN-BY: 218/215 700 720 840 860 880 900 920 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 426 428 470 550 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/1038 291/111 SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 5019/40 SEEN-BY: 5020/400 5075/35 PATH: 280/5555 464 103/705 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]