home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 1703 
 Marceline Jones to KAI RICHTER 
 Create message bases 
 07 Mar 21 18:03:00 
 
TZUTC: -0800
MSGID: 3734.golded@1:103/705 24a98ed2
REPLY: 2:240/77 603b89f6
PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 master/6f60905f3 Mar  6 2021 MSC 1928
TID: SBBSecho 3.13-Linux master/4365aac62 Mar  6 2021 GCC 8.3.0
BBSID: VERT
CHRS: ASCII 1
 KR>> Yes. There may be restrictions if you want to use hudson base but
 KR>> there is no reason to use that stoneaged format.
 
 MJ> I think it is cool to use stoneaged formats.

 KR> That's what Fidonet is. But there is no need to struggle with problems
 KR> that the stoneage already solved. Even those solutions are still
 KR> stoneaged. ;) 

If I ran QuickBBS, then I would use Hudson. What is the point of running QBBS
if not to use Hudson ?
 
 MJ> I want to check that packets contain the right messages and have been
 MJ> routed to the correct outbound directories.

 KR> That was done already when you use stoneaged software. If there are
 KR> routing troubles then the software is old enough that this troubles
 KR> would be known. 

You are assuming the software has no bugs.

What if I want to check my packed messages match what the mailer's outbound
queue says ?

 MJ> How do I check this without inspecting the packet ?

 KR> You could see it in the outbound directories itself or in the logfiles
 KR> if your software tries to connect to another system. 

Except outbound directories contain files like "EFAABCFF.mo0". I want a nice
user interface to scroll through and open such packets and check the message
contents.

 MJ> It is not uncommon. If I have a hammer, then I know I need a nail.
 MJ> What is the point of having a hammer if not to hammer something.

 KR> That's exactly what i was talking about, i don't need a hammer if
 KR> there is nothing to hammer. It's common to have no hammer if there is
 KR> no need to hammer anything. 

It is also common to have a hammer.

 KR>> Well, it was a long way from Blue Wave to node. What kind of
 KR>> other software do you plan to use? I went from offline qwk
 KR>> readers to point software and then to node software in point mode
 KR>> before i changed the aka to node.
 
 MJ> I was thinking about running Fidonet on a Nintendo.

 KR> Which one?

 KR> And how many hours would you need for such a project?

My point was I can skip all the other software and just go directly from QWK
to a node.

___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
--- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016
SEEN-BY: 129/305 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 452 664 1016 1017 240/77 2100 5138 5411 5824
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 5853 6309 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119
PATH: 103/705 280/464 240/5832 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca