Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1703  |
|  Marceline Jones to KAI RICHTER  |
|  Create message bases  |
|  07 Mar 21 18:03:00  |
 TZUTC: -0800 MSGID: 3734.golded@1:103/705 24a98ed2 REPLY: 2:240/77 603b89f6 PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Win32 master/6f60905f3 Mar 6 2021 MSC 1928 TID: SBBSecho 3.13-Linux master/4365aac62 Mar 6 2021 GCC 8.3.0 BBSID: VERT CHRS: ASCII 1 KR>> Yes. There may be restrictions if you want to use hudson base but KR>> there is no reason to use that stoneaged format. MJ> I think it is cool to use stoneaged formats. KR> That's what Fidonet is. But there is no need to struggle with problems KR> that the stoneage already solved. Even those solutions are still KR> stoneaged. ;) If I ran QuickBBS, then I would use Hudson. What is the point of running QBBS if not to use Hudson ? MJ> I want to check that packets contain the right messages and have been MJ> routed to the correct outbound directories. KR> That was done already when you use stoneaged software. If there are KR> routing troubles then the software is old enough that this troubles KR> would be known. You are assuming the software has no bugs. What if I want to check my packed messages match what the mailer's outbound queue says ? MJ> How do I check this without inspecting the packet ? KR> You could see it in the outbound directories itself or in the logfiles KR> if your software tries to connect to another system. Except outbound directories contain files like "EFAABCFF.mo0". I want a nice user interface to scroll through and open such packets and check the message contents. MJ> It is not uncommon. If I have a hammer, then I know I need a nail. MJ> What is the point of having a hammer if not to hammer something. KR> That's exactly what i was talking about, i don't need a hammer if KR> there is nothing to hammer. It's common to have no hammer if there is KR> no need to hammer anything. It is also common to have a hammer. KR>> Well, it was a long way from Blue Wave to node. What kind of KR>> other software do you plan to use? I went from offline qwk KR>> readers to point software and then to node software in point mode KR>> before i changed the aka to node. MJ> I was thinking about running Fidonet on a Nintendo. KR> Which one? KR> And how many hours would you need for such a project? My point was I can skip all the other software and just go directly from QWK to a node. ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705) SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 SEEN-BY: 129/305 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101 SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 452 664 1016 1017 240/77 2100 5138 5411 5824 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 5853 6309 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 PATH: 103/705 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]