Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1734  |
|  Marceline Jones to KAI RICHTER  |
|  Re: Create message bases  |
|  14 Mar 21 17:08:00  |
 TZUTC: -0800 MSGID: 3761.golded@1:103/705 24b2f5db REPLY: 2:240/77 604553d1 PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Win32 new_file_base/cea997c50 Mar 13 2021 MSC 1928 TID: SBBSecho 3.13-Linux new_file_base/824e987d3 Mar 13 2021 GCC 8.3.0 BBSID: VERT CHRS: ASCII 1 MJ> If I ran QuickBBS, then I would use Hudson. What is the point of MJ> running QBBS if not to use Hudson ? KR> Tell me why you don't run QBBS and maybe i have a chance to answer KR> your question. I do run QBBS. I do not like it because RemoteAccess is better. MJ> You are assuming the software has no bugs. KR> No. I assume that after years of fidonet wide operation routing bugs KR> would be known. I want to check it for myself. MJ> What if I want to check my packed messages match what the mailer's MJ> outbound queue says ? KR> If you do routing it does not match. That's the purpose of routing. KR> You send messages not to the destination but to another node. You will KR> have a destination mismatch between the messages and the envelope. KR> And even if you suspect your routing software faulty your links would KR> use other software that has proved it's working because you can read KR> this routed mail. If I use an area manager and have downlinks subscribed to different echoes, I want to be able to check that the scanner is packing mail correctly for each downlink (ie. downlinks are only receiving messages from subscribed echoes). A packet inspector makes it easy to monitor the files in outbound. MJ> Except outbound directories contain files like "EFAABCFF.mo0". KR> Those files doesn't have something to do with routing. You need to KR> check to flowfiles which are responsible for the routing destination. KR> Those are simple ascii files readable by a simple text editor. MJ> I want a nice user interface to scroll through and open such packets MJ> and check the message contents. Those files definitely have something to do with routing. In BSO-style outbound the file names and extensions control when and where the mailer sends files. When there are 50 files in outbound, a packet inspector makes it easy to check the intended routing. KR> Golded can't do this. Golded is a user editor that is in use after or KR> before those packed mail has been processed. Yes. This question was previously answered. But you insist on assuming there is no use to inspecting packets - which is wrong. ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 --- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705) SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 SEEN-BY: 129/305 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101 SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 452 664 1016 1017 240/77 2100 5138 5411 5824 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 5853 6309 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 PATH: 103/705 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]