Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2046  |
|  Vitaliy Aksyonov to Nil Alexandrov  |
|  Re: C++ standard version in GoldEd  |
|  27 Sep 23 17:17:24  |
 REPLY: 1:16/101 651478f1 MSGID: 1:104/117 6514b91d CHRS: CP866 2 TZUTC: -0600 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2022-07-03 Привет, Nil! 27 Sep 23 14:28, ты писал(а) Kai Richter: NA> Tuesday September 26 2023 23:22, from Kai Richter -> Vitaliy Aksyonov VA>>> My question is which C++ stnadard version may be appropriate in VA>>> GoldEd? NA> I read your question as -- what is the minimum -std=c++... I can NA> enable in my compiler that will not break any existing or future NA> builds. And the answer is GoldEd+ "supported" platforms and compilers. NA> Have you seen the list? Have you seen that (semi) automated CI/CD NA> pipeline? NA> I am joking here but you will see that there are volunteers who are NA> going to produce binary packages out of master branch once your pull NA> request is merged. This will give you a clue on which platforms are NA> still alive and what compilers they use. NA> Optimistically, I would establish the minimum C++ standard for GoldEd+ NA> to be C++11. Though, I am not sure about Open Watcom C/C++ NA> capabilities as I have seen it in use at least for the Husky project. Yep. I was the author of the question. Right now I'm using gcc with -std=c++98 and it compiles with my changes. But I didn't add anything fancy yet. I may try to setup Watcom compiler and try to build it there. I have tried to build with VC 2005 under Windows XP, but I need to finish dev env setup first. I've been using it long time ago and forgot a lot of stuff already. :) KR>> Well, i'm not qualified to answer that question. NA> At least, you can do your best effort. That's what I'm doing. I only can't have all possible OS/compilers combinations. VA>>> If it's possible to start using C++11, code may be made much VA>>> safer with modern features KR>> From a user point of view i don't care much about modern or old KR>> code as long it is working code. NA> As a user, will you run DOS version of GoldEd+? KR>> From a fidonet member point of view i would like to see support KR>> for as many as possible hard- and software platforms. NA> Software platforms? saas software as a service? KR>> On the other hand old code running on old hard- and software will KR>> continue to work on old systems like they do now. NA> True. You still can download .exe files for Dos/OS2/Win32/you name it NA> and it shall/shouldbe compatible with the modern FTN software, because NA> we have established FTSC facility. Older versions can be easily build with older compliers, but would be really nice to be able to build new fixes and/or features with old compilers too. Best regards, Vitaliy Aksyonov. ... Пришел незамеченным - уйди незамоченным! --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20230920 * Origin: Aurora, Colorado (1:104/117) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 104/117 105/81 106/201 123/131 129/305 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 452 470 664 700 266/512 282/1038 291/111 SEEN-BY: 292/854 305/3 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 PATH: 104/117 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]