REPLY: 139.fdn_ham@3:633/509 26735042
MSGID: 1:18/200@fidonet 620e67e1
CHRS: UTF-8 2
TZUTC: -0500
TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.0.8 (GNU/Linux-x86_64)
Hello deon,

17 Feb 22 20:47, you wrote to me:

 de> CGNAT is an IPv4 solution due to the lack of IPv4 addresses - where
 de> the answer is IPv6 isnt it?

Yes, you're right.  I stand corrected.

 de> I've not heard of ISP's selling single static IPv6 addresses - I
 de> thought most gave you a /64, /60 or /56 as part of the service you get
 de> with them.

I wouldn't know.  Here in the US, it is exceedingly difficult to find a large 
ISP that supports IPv6.  All of the large ISPs have a significant investment 
in IPv4 with NAT/CGNAT and are -very- hesitant to change.

It's so much so that all of my computers have IPv6 disabled as there's no need 
for it right now.

A side note: here's an interesting opinion article about why IPv6 hasn't had 
wide adoption yet in the past 25 years of its existance:
https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/24/opinion_column_ipv6/

This is quickly becoming off-topic so netmail is welcome or we can move this 
somewhere else.

Are you an amateur radio operator?

-- Sean KS4TD

... America is the land of opportunity.  Everyone can become a taxpayer.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
 * Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (1:18/200)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 129/305
SEEN-BY: 129/330 331 153/7715 226/30 227/114 229/110 200 206 312 317
SEEN-BY: 229/400 424 426 428 664 700 240/5832 266/512 282/1038 292/854
SEEN-BY: 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280
SEEN-BY: 712/848
PATH: 18/200 229/426