Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 13241  |
|  Mortar M. to Daryl Stout  |
|  Re: Pet peves  |
|  06 Jan 26 23:41:27  |
 TZUTC: -0600 MSGID: 3857.fido_ham@1:124/5016 2dc33718 REPLY: 258.fidonet_ham@1:19/33 2dc2d120 PID: Synchronet 3.21b-Linux master/20122f0d3 Jan 05 2026 GCC 13.3.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.34-Linux master/20122f0d3 Jan 05 2026 GCC 13.3.0 BBSID: EOTLBBS CHRS: ASCII 1 FORMAT: flowed NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105 Re: Re: Pet peves By: Daryl Stout to Rug Rat on Tue Jan 06 2026 17:26:22 > 1) Stations not using ITU phonetics at checkin on nets. Agreed. The whole purpose (for those who don't know) of using ITU phonetics is to make it clear (hopefully) what letters make up your callsign. This is especially important when working non-English contacts. Using cutesy words risks muddying the waters. > 3) Stations claiming their club is the best. Nothing wring with being proud of your club, as long as you don't get agressive about it. > 4) Stations saying "you're not a ham if you don't do CW". Also agreed. I do think the hobby has lost some of itself by elimiting the CW testing. Besides being a useful skill, I think it acts as a stop gap for those just wanting to get a mic in their hands (I'm looking at you, CBers.) Learning CW takes time and patience and shows a true desire to become a ham. > 6) Stations saying "internet radio is not ham radio". IMO, it's not. Hame radio is about making contact, radio to radio. --- SBBSecho 3.34-Linux * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016) SEEN-BY: 18/200 19/25 33 38 41 42 105/81 106/201 987 124/0 5016 128/187 SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 130/330 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30 227/114 SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 134 200 206 275 300 307 312 317 400 426 428 470 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219 322/757 342/200 SEEN-BY: 387/18 25 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5020/400 5075/35 PATH: 124/5016 396/45 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]