home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 122 
 TIM RICHARDSON to EARL CROASMUN 
 Arizona discrimination 
 08 Mar 14 09:11:00 
 
On 03-07-14, EARL CROASMUN said to TIM RICHARDSON:

>> But this baker is being pilloried because he will not sign onto the
EC>wedding >> Again, baking a cake does not involve signing onto the wedding.


>Yes it does. And if it doesn't, then no prosecutor can ever bring someone
>into >court for furnishing the car used in a bank robbery. No citizen can
>ever again be prosecuted for furnishing the gun that is used to murder
>someone.


EC>Completely different.


Not at all. Which you admit in your very next paragraph:


EC>Lending or selling someone a car does not
EC>make you a participant in whatever they DO with that car later.


Not if you DON't KNOW what they're going to do with it.


However:


EC>And if
EC>you know they are going to rob a bank and do not report it, that makes you
EC>an accessory to the crime whether you lent them the car or not.


And if you are a Christian baker who KNOWS a wedding cake ordered from you is
intended to celebrate a s-called `wedding' between two same-sex sodomites, and
you bake it for them anyway, that makes you an accessory to sodomy!


>>> The wedding can happen with or without a photographer.


>> It can happen with or without a wedding cake, also.


>> Exactly.

> Ah...then you AGREE that the cake really has no bearing on whether or not
the > wedding itself occurs?


EC>That was exactly what I said.  In this case the wedding HAD ALREADY
EC>HAPPENED in fact, so the photographer and the baker had no connection to
EC>it HAPPENING.


Then....what, exactly, is the problem these two same-sex sodomites have? If
they're already `married'....what's the beef? The baker is within their rights
to refuse to be a party to sodomy, or even any appearance of participating in
such on religious grounds.


Freedom of Religion is either real, or it isn't. I strongly suspect that, if
this were a bakery owned and operated by a family of Islamics, we would not be
having this exchange because this would never have come up in a court.


Why take a case to a court over a *Christian* bakery? Feels like a put-up job
to me.


---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca