Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 122  |
|  TIM RICHARDSON to EARL CROASMUN  |
|  Arizona discrimination  |
|  08 Mar 14 09:11:00  |
 On 03-07-14, EARL CROASMUN said to TIM RICHARDSON: >> But this baker is being pilloried because he will not sign onto the EC>wedding >> Again, baking a cake does not involve signing onto the wedding. >Yes it does. And if it doesn't, then no prosecutor can ever bring someone >into >court for furnishing the car used in a bank robbery. No citizen can >ever again be prosecuted for furnishing the gun that is used to murder >someone. EC>Completely different. Not at all. Which you admit in your very next paragraph: EC>Lending or selling someone a car does not EC>make you a participant in whatever they DO with that car later. Not if you DON't KNOW what they're going to do with it. However: EC>And if EC>you know they are going to rob a bank and do not report it, that makes you EC>an accessory to the crime whether you lent them the car or not. And if you are a Christian baker who KNOWS a wedding cake ordered from you is intended to celebrate a s-called `wedding' between two same-sex sodomites, and you bake it for them anyway, that makes you an accessory to sodomy! >>> The wedding can happen with or without a photographer. >> It can happen with or without a wedding cake, also. >> Exactly. > Ah...then you AGREE that the cake really has no bearing on whether or not the > wedding itself occurs? EC>That was exactly what I said. In this case the wedding HAD ALREADY EC>HAPPENED in fact, so the photographer and the baker had no connection to EC>it HAPPENING. Then....what, exactly, is the problem these two same-sex sodomites have? If they're already `married'....what's the beef? The baker is within their rights to refuse to be a party to sodomy, or even any appearance of participating in such on religious grounds. Freedom of Religion is either real, or it isn't. I strongly suspect that, if this were a bakery owned and operated by a family of Islamics, we would not be having this exchange because this would never have come up in a court. Why take a case to a court over a *Christian* bakery? Feels like a put-up job to me. --- *Durango b301 #PE* * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]