On 03-08-14, EARL CROASMUN said to TIM RICHARDSON:

> Just go to a different bakery! Problem solved! Why make a court case out of
> it?


EC>By the way, they didn't have to go to a different baker.  A different
EC>baker went to THEM, after the story came out.  The couple got a FREE cake,
EC>and the second baker got a lot of free publicity.  A video of the
EC>celebration is on YouTube.


EC>But that does not change the fact that the first baker broke the law.


!!!!!?????!!!  *Broke the law*? Broke WHAT law? There is a *law* that states a
devout Christian baker HAS to sign on to a same-sex sodomite `wedding' in
violation of their strongly-held relilgious beliefs? A *law* that a business
person no longer has the right to refuse service to anyone?


If these two same-sex sodomites prevail in this case, and a court rules the
baker HAS to bake their cake regardless of their legitimately-held religious
beliefs, then two things occur:


1. Every sign that says *We Reserve The Right To Refuse Service To Anyone*, in
every business in the entire country must be taken down.

2. There is no longer Freedom of Religion in this country, and the United
States Constitution no longer exists, except as an historic curio.


And if, as you say, a different baker `went to them'...then they got their
fucking cake, and thats an end to it.


Which raises the question: Why go to court?


Oh wait! I see! The *ACLU* stuck its nose into this and THEY are the driving
force behind the court case! I should have known!


But...Massachusetts allows same-sex sodomite weddings...and Colorado doesn't.


These two same-sex sodomites were `married' in Massachusetts, and were
`celebrating' in Colorado. Colorado doesn't allow same-sex `marriage' between
two sodomites, only `civil unions'.


So...these two same-sex sodomites, who are `married' in Massachusetts...go all
the way to Colorado to `celebrate'! Perfectly good bakeries in Massachusetts.
...Colorado slightly over 3000 miles away from Massachusetts!


Trip alone must have cost a small fortune...not to mention accomadations in
Colorado (not cheap, by the way, especially during ski'ing season).


Anyway...they get there, order a cake from a *Christian* bakery to
celebrate a same-sex *sodomite* `wedding'....and when they're refused, the
*ACLU* is waiting in the wings to take the bakery to court on discrimination
charges!


I mean....(what are the odds?)...the very first bakery they walk into to order
a cake to celebrate a sodomite `wedding', is a bakery who's owner is a
devoutly-believing Christian, cannot, on religious grounds, participate in a
celebration of `sodomy'! And (low and behold!) the *ACLU* is just...oh...you
know, just sort of `in the neighborhood'...for the `ski'ing', you understand!


Another question that arises:


If, after being refused service by this bakery they have in court, another
bakery stepped forward (all voluntary-like, you understand...just `happen' to
be nearby and over-heard this same-sex sodmite pair `might' be in the market
for a cake celebrating their sodomite `wedding') and baked the
friggin' cake....why (oh, why) would these two sodomites from Massachusetts
hang around at even MORE expense, and take this bakery into court?


The *ACLU*? Another bakery just `steps forward' and bakes the cake? A court
case about `discrimination'?


Beginning to appear  more and more like a put-up job!


An assault on Christianity. One more step in the continuing struggle to drag
our culture down to the level the Sodomites occupy.


Like `Affirmative Action'. If the Sodomites can't live `up' to the high moral
standards Christians (and, at one time, the Nation) set for themselves...then
drag the Christians (and the Nation) down to theirs.





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)