MSGID: 2:221/360.0 5eb973b0
REPLY: 2:310/31 5eb92b5f
PID: JamNNTPd/OS2 1.3 20200418
TID: GE/2 1.2
CHRS: UTF-8 4
TZUTC: 0300
On 11/05/2020 6:35 a.m., Richard Menedetter : August Abolins wrote:

RM> I have again learned a new word (prudent roughly equal to intelligent I
guess).

:)

RM> Here the camera is secured by a slider, that you need to slide manually
over,
RM> otherwise you get a black video. Additionally you have a hardware LED that
is
RM> lit when the camera is active.

A few years ago, I read that there was a way to disable the LED light yet
enable
the camera.  Maybe it only pertains to Windows, dunno.  But it was grounded on
requiring to have allowed a rogue program to get settled on your machine.


RM> If you want to have a video conference you need to allow video access. And
I
RM> do not see the difference weather I allow access to the browser or a
RM> specialzed app like teams or zoom.

As long as we perceive that the video app is under our control then there's no
problem, I guess.  ;)   But.. when reports surface months/years later that
program X had a bug that allowed remote control of the camera then that could
be
mildly upsetting.


RM> When I go with the browser to my https secured webpoage with Jitsi that I
set
RM> up, and it asks me to allow video access, I feel quit safe.

At least Jitsi is open source.. and anyone can take a look inside to look for
clues if anything nefarious is going on.

--- TB(Stealth)/Win7
 * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 120/340 601 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 452 664 1014 240/5138
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 5853 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854
SEEN-BY: 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/81
SEEN-BY: 423/120 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119
PATH: 221/360 1 280/464 240/5832 229/426