Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2113  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins  |
|  Re: UL speed misnomer?  |
|  25 May 24 17:55:46  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: CP850 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20240306 MSGID: 2:280/464 66520b00 REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet 14c22629 Hi August, On 2024-05-25 08:47:00, you wrote to All: AA> I recently subscribed to fibre. The promise was 25Mbps UL/DL. AA> So far so good wrt download speed. But when I needed to SFTP a AA> few large files to my server, the max transfer rate I could get AA> was 300KiB/s which translates to 2.5Mbps. So, I assume the UL AA> speed limitation is placed at the server? Fast.com reports AA> 30+Mbps bidirectional. Even 25Mbps sounds slow for fibre connections. They will be installing a fibre connection in my house next week. I haven't decided on a subscription with a provider yet. But speeds I can choose from are: 100, 400 Mbit/s, and 1, 2 and 8 Gbit/s Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305 153/757 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 275 300 317 400 426 428 470 550 664 700 705 SEEN-BY: 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854 SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 SEEN-BY: 5020/400 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]