home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 2115 
 Nick Mackechnie to August Abolins 
 Re: UL speed misnomer? 
 26 May 24 10:05:00 
 
Via SLMAIL v5.1  (#SLO409KEDG15G098)
 >I recently subscribed to fibre. The promise was 25Mbps UL/DL.
 >So far so good wrt download speed.  But when I needed to SFTP a
 >few large files to my server, the max transfer rate I could get
 >was 300KiB/s which translates to 2.5Mbps. So, I assume the UL
 >speed limitation is placed at the server? Fast.com reports
 >30+Mbps bidirectional.
 >
 >Anyone else here experience limited/reduced UL speeds during
 >ftp transfers?
 >
 >What services provide unrestricted UL speeds?

Hey Aug,

So it's could be governed by the server side most so than your fibre
provider. What are you using as your SFTP/FTP server? Are there
Policies/rste limiting on your router for the S/FTP service?

25MB UL/DL is an interesting speed, where in the world are you? In NZ
residetial speeds are a minimum of 300Dl 100 UL, and go upto 10gb.

Nick

--- SLMAIL v5.1  (#SLO409KEDG15G098)
 * Origin: The Trashcan - The BEST Rubbish * bbs.thenet.gen.nz (3:772/210)
SEEN-BY: 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305 153/757
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 840 220/70 221/0 226/17
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 275 300 317 400 426 428
SEEN-BY: 229/470 550 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 266/512 267/800 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124
SEEN-BY: 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400
SEEN-BY: 5054/30 5075/35
PATH: 772/210 770/1 280/464 460/58 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca