Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2119  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Bob Worm  |
|  Re: UL speed misnomer?  |
|  09 Jun 24 12:52:47  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: CP850 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20240306 MSGID: 2:280/464 66658af8 REPLY: 660.fidonet_internet@2:250/3 2aca28d0 Hi Bob, On 2024-06-09 00:58:52, you wrote to me: >> 100, 400 Mbit/s, and 1, 2 and 8 Gbit/s BW> Wow, 8 Gbps would mean you're basically getting an entire XGS-PON to yourself. BW> That can't make commercial sense for the operator unless they're charging you BW> a *lot* for that Prices in Euros/month are: 100 35 400 40 1GB 45 2GB 60 8GB 85 BW> or just contending the line very heavily. I think that is the case. BW> In practice you could give all the customers on a fibre the full BW> speed, their actual usage would be a fraction of that :) Probably. Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305 153/757 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 300 317 400 426 428 470 550 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 SEEN-BY: 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 5054/30 SEEN-BY: 5075/35 PATH: 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]