Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3589  |
|  Tommi Koivula to Michiel van der Vlist  |
|  he.net  |
|  19 Jul 21 19:40:04  |
 REPLY: 2:280/5555 60f57bdc MSGID: 2:221/360 60f5ad6d CHRS: CP437 2 TZUTC: 0300 Hi Michiel. 19 Jul 21 15:19:22, you wrote to Andrew Leary: MV>>> he.net was always using 2001:407:: for tunnels. It seems they now MV>>> use AL>> 2001:470:: in my experience... I still have a tunnel registered with AL>> he.net but haven't used it lately since my ISP now offers native IPv6. MV> The 407 was a typo. I too had a 2001:470:: address for my tunnel. My experience is that yje MV> delete tunnels that are no longer kept alive. When I goy native IPv6 I could not kee[ the MV> tunnel because the router from my provider does not support tunnels. MV>>> 2006:70ff:: MV> Andrew Savin has a he.net tunnel with a 2006:70ff:: address. MV> I wonder if they exausted the 2001:470::/32 block... Just created a tunnel to stockholm: === Cut === Routed IPv6 Prefixes Routed /64:2001:470:28:376::/64 Routed /48:2001:470:dfeb::/48 === Cut === So it may depend which endpoint to use... I still have one operational tunnel which I created "Nov 14, 2014".. Both /64 and /48. :) 'Tommi --- * Origin: rbb.fidonet.fi (2:221/360) SEEN-BY: 1/123 30/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 154/10 221/1 SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/30 227/702 229/424 426 428 550 700 1016 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/206 317 400 261/38 280/464 5555 282/464 1038 SEEN-BY: 301/0 1 101 113 812 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/200 460/58 SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 920/1 4500/1 5020/1042 5058/104 PATH: 221/6 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]