REPLY: 2:280/5555 6141e290
MSGID: 2:5005/49 61433fdf
CHRS: CP866 2
TZUTC: 0700
TID: hpt/fbsd 1.9.0-cur 2019-12-05
Dear Michiel,

15 Sep 21 14:02, you wrote to me:

 BR>>> You can always get a tunneled IPv6 block free from HE.net and
 BR>>> tell your ISP to piss off. That's what I basically did and I've
 BR>>> been fine since.

 VS>> That's what I've done, but it results in a lower bandwidth over
 VS>> IPv6, and extra hops.

 MV> A tunnel is good, native IPv6 is better. I noticed it too when I used
 MV> tunnels. IPv6 over the tunnel is significantky slower than IPv4. Up to
 MV> 50% slower. Native IPv6 is always preferable so we we should all keep
 MV> perstering our ISPs about IPv6.

I fully agree.

 VS>> The bandwidth is so much lower that browsers tend to fall back to
 VS>> IPv4

 MV> I haven't seen that particular problem.

Please see my reply to Brian.

 VS>> (Yes I know there is a tweak to stop this behaviour in Firefox,
 VS>> nevertheless my IPv6 connection is inferior to IPv4).

 MV> As I said: native is preferable, but a tunnel is better than no IPv6
 MV> at all.

Sure.

Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
--- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20170303-b20170303
 * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 50/109 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 153/757
SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 218/840 221/0 1 6 226/30 227/702 229/424 426
SEEN-BY: 229/428 550 664 700 240/5138 5411 5824 5832 5853 249/206
SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125
SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 342/200 423/120
SEEN-BY: 460/58 463/68 467/239 888 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250
SEEN-BY: 2454/119 4500/1 5000/111 5001/100 5005/49 53 5015/46 5020/545
SEEN-BY: 5020/715 830 846 1042 2047 2140 4441 5058/104 5064/56 5080/102
SEEN-BY: 5083/1 444
PATH: 5005/49 5020/1042 221/6 153/757 280/464 240/5832 229/426