Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3794  |
|  Michiel van der Vlist to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  List of IPv6 nodes  |
|  06 Jan 22 14:04:52  |
 TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: CP850 2 MSGID: 2:280/5555 61d6edb6 REPLY: 2:280/464 61d6e588 Hello Wilfred, On Thursday January 06 2022 13:45, you wrote to me: WV> So maybe it is just to save a bit on addresses? If only 1% of WV> customers isn't online at any give time, if you have a milion WV> customers that is still 10000 addresses... 1) For IPv6 it is no issue. There is no shortage on IPv6 adresses. (yet) 2) 1% is too little for an overbooking system with a resonable margin for fluctuations. You can't just use all those 10000 adresses elsewehere, you have to leave a subsatnatial number on the shelve just in case a lot off those off-liners decide to come on-line at the same time. I don't think it is worth it with those margins. 3) They don't do it. It I go off-line my address remains reserved for me for at least a week. WV> And it's probably easier to "administer" dynamic addresses. Is it? With dynamic adresses they have to keep logs of who uses what address (prefix) at what time. (For law enforcement purposes). Cheers, Michiel --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303 * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 19/10 30/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 226/30 229/424 426 428 550 SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 400 250/1 266/512 280/464 SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5006 5555 282/464 1038 301/0 1 101 113 812 310/31 SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 640/1384 SEEN-BY: 712/848 920/1 2452/250 5019/40 5020/545 1042 12000 5053/58 SEEN-BY: 5058/104 PATH: 280/5555 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]