Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3797  |
|  Victor Sudakov to Michiel van der Vlist  |
|  List of IPv6 nodes  |
|  07 Jan 22 10:32:48  |
 REPLY: 2:280/5555 61d6edb6 MSGID: 2:5005/49 61d7b672 CHRS: CP866 2 TZUTC: 0700 TID: hpt/fbsd 1.9.0-cur 2019-12-05 Dear Michiel, 06 Jan 22 14:04, you wrote to Wilfred van Velzen: WV>> So maybe it is just to save a bit on addresses? If only 1% of WV>> customers isn't online at any give time, if you have a milion WV>> customers that is still 10000 addresses... MV> 1) For IPv6 it is no issue. There is no shortage on IPv6 adresses. MV> (yet) And may never happen. But a shortage on IPv6 prefixes can happen IMHO, if /48s are given away easily. There is only 35 million million (35 trillion) /48 blocks in the current global 2000::/3 pool. A trillion is not that much, I think a trillion bacteria live on 1 human person. Do you know if the 2000::/3 global pool can be extended if necessary? OTOH, we don't need an IPv6 *prefix* per each bacteria, one IPv6 *address* per bacteria is sufficient, so a /64 for each human being is more than enough. Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20170303-b20170303 * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 30/0 50/109 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 221/1 6 226/30 229/424 426 428 550 664 700 SEEN-BY: 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 400 266/512 280/464 5555 282/464 SEEN-BY: 282/1038 301/0 1 101 113 812 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 463/68 467/239 888 633/280 712/848 920/1 5000/111 SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 53 5015/46 5020/715 830 846 1042 2047 2140 SEEN-BY: 5020/4441 5054/8 5058/104 5064/56 5080/102 5083/1 444 PATH: 5005/49 5020/1042 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]