Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3821  |
|  Alexey Vissarionov to Victor Sudakov  |
|  List of IPv6 nodes  |
|  09 Jan 22 09:21:00  |
 
REPLY: 2:5005/49 61d935b4
MSGID: 2:5020/545 61da7f32
CHRS: CP866 2
TZUTC: 0300
Good ${greeting_time}, Victor!
08 Jan 2022 13:48:30, you wrote to me:
TK>>>> I have a wireguard server running in my VPS (Ubuntu 20.04.3
TK>>>> LTS). It is using a /112 of /64 for it's clients.
VS>>> Do you mean to say you can have a /64 network on your VPS' main
VS>>> interface and at the same time a /112 from the *same* *network*
VS>>> on a wg0 interface? Is this even permitted by the OS?
AV>> Yes - at least properly configured Linux allows this.
VS> What do you mean by "properly configured"? You mean the
VS> out-of-the-box configuration still does not allow this?
Obviously.
VS> A Cisco router would not allow the same L2 network on two different
VS> L3 interfaces IMHO, even if one of the prefixes is more specific.
That's a limitation of BSD-style IP stack.
--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii
... GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
--- /bin/vi
* Origin: ::1 (2:5020/545)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 30/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131
SEEN-BY: 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 226/30 229/110
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 428 550 664 700 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 400
SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/464 1038 292/854 8125
SEEN-BY: 301/0 1 101 113 812 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/234
SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 920/1
SEEN-BY: 2452/250 5020/545 736 1042 5058/104
PATH: 5020/545 280/464 301/1 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]