TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0100
CHRS: CP850 2
MSGID: 2:280/5555 61dc4ca4
REPLY: 2:203/2 61dc4752
Hello Bj”rn,

On Monday January 10 2022 15:48, you wrote to me:

 MvdV>> Just one /64 would not be satisfactory to me.

 BF>    Doesn't a /64 contain 2^64 addresses? Not enough? The entire IPv4
 BF> pool is 2^32...

It is not that 2^64 addresses are not enough for all my devices, it is that a
/64 can not be divided into subnets. That is the way it is designed. A /64 is
the smallest subnet. I might have designed it different but I was not involved
at the time.

So... if one wants/needs more than one subnet, one needs more than one /64.
That is the way it is.

It should be no problem, there is enough for everyone.


Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 19/10 30/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 226/30 229/110 424 426 428
SEEN-BY: 229/550 664 700 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 400 250/1 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/464 1038 301/0 1 101 113 812 310/31
SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 640/1384
SEEN-BY: 712/848 920/1 2452/250 5019/40 5020/545 1042 12000 5053/58
SEEN-BY: 5058/104
PATH: 280/5555 301/1 229/426