Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 3847  |
|  deon to Michiel van der Vlist  |
|  List of IPv6 nodes  |
|  13 Jan 22 10:10:42  |
 TZUTC: 1100 MSGID: 1343.fdn_ipv6@3:633/509 26449b31 REPLY: 2:280/5555 61dee636 PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/8f79438d2 Apr 24 2021 GCC 8.3.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/8f79438d2 Apr 24 2021 GCC 8.3.0 COLS: 139 BBSID: ALTERANT CHRS: CP437 2 NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104 Re: List of IPv6 nodes By: Michiel van der Vlist to deon on Wed Jan 12 2022 03:28 pm Howdy, > de> I use /80's a lot, which in reality could be /96's but I'm being > de> generous to the network that I use the /80's on. > > But why? When you can have enough space to make /64 subnets? Because in my use case, having a /64 for 2 or 3 hosts is a waste - and given in that use case it is a manual config anyway, spliting up an already routed /64 into smaller parts, is easier than routing multiple /64 through intermediate hosts. > And some thing will not work any more. From an IP comms point of view, I've never not handing work anymore. From a SLAAC point of view, sure - which was my earlier comment around simple setup. ...лоеп --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 153/7715 226/30 SEEN-BY: 229/110 424 426 428 550 664 700 240/5832 249/206 317 400 SEEN-BY: 266/512 282/1038 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 281 410 412 416 509 640/1384 712/848 770/1 PATH: 633/509 280 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]