TID: FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0
BBSID: KCO
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: UTF-8 4
EID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.0.
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20230305
REPLY: 2:280/5555 641daa1d
MSGID: 2:221/6.0 641db2ee
On 24.3.2023 15.39, Michiel van der Vlist wrote:

> In the case of he.net the bussines model was spreading IPv6 so that
> they could make money on those needing help getting their bussines
> running on IPv6. There are indications that their free tunnels may
> not last forever.
>
> Route48? Frankly I know very little about them. But whatever their
> bussines model was, it apparently didn't work...

Don't know about business model, but route48 was nice because they offered
tunnel by wireguard. Wireguard doesn't need public ipv4.

They also had a server in Finland. :)

'Tommi

--- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0
 * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 104/117 105/81 106/201 123/131 124/5016 153/757
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114
SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 206 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 550
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 230/0 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006
SEEN-BY: 280/5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 281 410 412 418 420 509 712/848 770/1 4500/1
SEEN-BY: 5020/545 1042
PATH: 221/6 1 280/464 633/280 229/426