TID: FMail-W32 2.3.2.3-B20240423
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: CP850 2
MSGID: 2:280/464.5555 665f2fe5
REPLY: 2:280/2050 665ed8a2
Hello Floris,

On Tuesday June 04 2024 11:03, you wrote to All:

 FU> https://konecipv4.cz/en/

 FU> i found this from a blog article at SIDN:
 FU> https://www.sidn.nl/en/news-and-blogs/czech-government-to-withdraw-ipv
 FU> 4-support-in-8-years

Interesting. My not so humble opinion is that getting rid of IPv4 is a good
idea. Ipv6 is the future and keeping both versions alive side by side is
needlessly complex and expansive. So the sooner we get rid of IPv4, the
better. About a decade ago I decided not to buy new network equipment that
does not support IPv6 end earlier this year I updated it to: No network
equipment that can not function in an IPv6 only environment.

Having said that, the reality is that lots of things do not work properly yet
without IPv4, so the IPv6 only age is still a log way off.

That the Czech government takes this step is a good thing. I hope more will
follow. Then again a lot can happen in eight years, so we we see if they
really go through with it.

Also read:

https://www.sidnlabs.nl/nieuws-en-blogs/kan-ipv4-al-uit-over-ons
jaarlijkse-ipv 6-only-experiment

Sorry, it is in Dutch...


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111
 * Origin: Michiel's laptop (2:280/464.5555)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 103/705 104/117 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260
SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 215 700 860 870
SEEN-BY: 218/940 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 400
SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5006 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31
SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58
SEEN-BY: 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 545
PATH: 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426