TID: FMail-W32 2.3.0.1-B20240319
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: CP850 2
MSGID: 2:280/5555 66f86a9a
REPLY: 2:5001/100.1 66f84e36
Hello Dmitry,

On Saturday September 28 2024 19:30, you wrote to me:

 DP> BinkpAbstractConnector Protocol version 1.1 28-09-24 17:23:08
 DP> [00007394] BinkpAsyncConnector  Frame received: [ M_ADR
 DP> 2:280/5555@fidonet ] 28-09-24 17:23:08 [00007394]
 DP> BinkpAbstractConnector Invalid address 28-09-24 17:23:08 [00007394]
 DP> NodelistScanner      Using nodelist file nodelist 28-09-24 17:23:08
 DP> [00007394] BinkpAbstractConnector Local error: No valid address
 DP> specified

AH, I see. You refuse connections with unlisted systems. There is a flag for
that, the LO flag. You do not carry that flag in the nodelist. So....

Whatever, it will be fixed in a couple of hours.

 DP> @PATH: 280/5555 5020/1042 4441 5001/100

 DP> Looks like 2:5020/1042 deserves a punishment..

For what?

 DP> And you are even not allowed no post here :)

Says who?

Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)
SEEN-BY: 19/10 90/1 103/705 104/117 105/81 106/201 124/5016 153/757
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110
SEEN-BY: 229/114 206 317 400 426 428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 250/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/1038 291/111
SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 467/888 633/267 280 281 410 412 418
SEEN-BY: 633/420 509 2744 712/848 770/1 5020/400 545 1042 5053/58
SEEN-BY: 5075/35
PATH: 280/5555 464 633/280 229/426