TID: FMail-W32 2.3.0.1-B20240319
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: CP850 2
MSGID: 2:280/5555 68a093d2
REPLY: 2:5019/40.1 689fc1ee
Hello Konstantin,

On Saturday August 16 2025 02:25, you wrote to me:


 SM>>> It's not my fall. :(

 MvdV>> I can't find anything wrong at this side either, so it remains
 MvdV>> a mystery why the IPv6 connection with your system is so
 MvdV>> unstable.

 KK> Tunnelbroker nowadays is not what it used to be.

I do not connect to Stas via a he.net tunnel. He recently got a native IOv6
connection and that is what we were discussing here.

 KK> Amsterdam POP is long over-capacity and you can't even request new
 KK> tunnel there. It has jitter up to 3x times the latency and constant
 KK> packet loss around 3-5% inside HE network.

Be that as it may be, I have no issues connecting with your system.

Having said that...

 KK> Couple of months ago it was even worse as there was constant 20-40%
 KK> packet loss for months and couple of days long complete outages. Other
 KK> more close to me POPs like Stockholm are even worse as despite lower
 KK> latency jitter and packet loss there even bigger and they often
 KK> partially or completely lose connectivity even to main HE network and
 KK> becomes isolated.

It was to be expected that this wonderfull service would not last forever.
Time to put pressure on your ISP to go support native IPv6!


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 16/0 19/10 37 104/117 105/81 106/201 123/130 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 142/104 153/7715 154/10 110 201/0 203/0 218/700 221/0
SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 114 206 317 400 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/616 664 700 705 230/0 240/1120 5832 250/1 266/512 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 291/111 292/854 301/1 310/31 320/119 219 319
SEEN-BY: 320/2119 322/757 762 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280
SEEN-BY: 902/26 5019/40 5020/545 1042 5053/58 5075/35
PATH: 280/5555 221/1 320/219 229/426