TID: FMail-W32 2.3.0.1-B20240319
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: CP850 2
MSGID: 2:280/5555 68f2666a
REPLY: 2:5001/100.1 68f254a4
Hello Dmitry,

On Friday October 17 2025 17:37, you wrote to me:

 DP> Hello, Michiel!

 DP> Friday October 17 2025 14:20, you wrote to me:

 MV>>> Now that you mention it... There is just one categorie I have not
 MV>>> seen yet: IPv6 only nodes. AFAIK here are just two of them at the
 MV>>> moment but this number may rise in the foreseeable future. Hpw about
 MV>>> adding "IPv6 only" to IPv6 Analytics?

 MV>> Wouw! I see that you already added that category.

 DP> Oops! You've caught me in the process of adding and testing new code,
 DP> which could be incorrect... ;)

 DP> My code lacked proper INO4 flag support, and I am still fixing
 DP> remaining bugs. Please check the "History" button to see the test
 DP> results - sometimes IPv6 only node is simply a misconfigured node that
 DP> has lost IPv4 access.

The result may not have been what you intended, but it did reveal an
interesting category that I did not expect: nodes with working IPv6 with
advertised but non working IPv4. Pleas keep it as a seperate caregory.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
 * Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 19/10 103/705 104/117 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/757 7715 154/10 30 110 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 215
SEEN-BY: 218/610 620 700 860 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 317
SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 616 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 250/1 263/1
SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 5555 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1
SEEN-BY: 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120
SEEN-BY: 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5019/40 5020/400
SEEN-BY: 5020/545 1042 5053/58 5075/35
PATH: 280/5555 464 103/705 218/700 229/426