Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 4531  |
|  Dan Clough to Michiel van der Vlist  |
|  Re: What sense is a tunnel? (was: '-Unpu  |
|  07 Nov 25 21:15:52  |
 TZUTC: -0600 MSGID: 1843.fido_ipv6@1:135/115 2d73f31b REPLY: 2:280/5555 690e05b1 PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/955e50fea Aug 10 2025 GCC 14.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.29-Linux master/955e50fea Aug 10 2025 GCC 14.2.0 BBSID: PALANTIR CHRS: CP437 2 FORMAT: flowed -=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=- DC> I would like to throw this out there, though - what sense does it make DC> to use a 6-to-4 tunnel for this? If v4 goes under, doesn't the DC> tunnel also no longer work? What's the point of that? When v4 dies, DC> my ISP would (hopefully!) offer v6 and I'd be in the club. My DC> thoughts are that if it isn't available to me natively, what *actual* DC> use would a tunnel kludge provide to me? MvV> A valid point. For a tunnel to function you do indeed need a working MvV> IPv4 connection. So what is the use of the tunnel anyway? MvV> 1) You still have fully flegded IPv4 from your provider but not MvV> everywone else in the world is that lucky. The number of people that MvV> have to make do with a so called CGNAT IPv4 address is rising. CGNAT is MvV> a technology used by providers to have many customers share a single MvV> public IPV4 address. It is similar to NAT on your own LAN where a MvV> single IPv4 adress is used by many devices on your LAN. With the MvV> difference that there is no port forwarding available for the customer. MvV> Those who's provider uses this technology to deal with the shortage of MvV> iPv4 adresses can only run servers that are accessable via IPv6. To MvV> connect to those servers you need IPv6 and if your provider does not MvV> support native IPv6, you can make use of a tunnel. This has not yet MvV> have a great effect on Fidonet, but the number of sysops confronted MvV> with CGANAT is rising. Okay, so I can see that (running a server in an area only served by CGNAT) as being a valid reason to want/need IPv6. I guess I didn't know that kind of thing was already happening. Certainly haven't seen or heard of it being a thing where I am. MvV> 2) You can use a tunnel to experiment with IPv6 and prepare for the day MvV> in the near or not so near future that installing IPv6 will be MvV> unavoidable. A little less valid than the CGNAT scenario, but maybe... OK. MvV> 3) To put pressure on your ISP. If the provider sees that his costomers MvV> are using tunnels to connect via IPv6 with the rest of the world they MvV> may wake up. In any case it is a counter argument to what providers MvV> dragging their feet often use: there is no demand for IPv6 from our MvV> customeres. From a technical perspective, *can* the ISP "see" that I was using a tunnel? I would think they could not, and I'm fairly confident they wouldn't care or "wake up". One reason they haven't provided it would be because it would cost them money to do so, and.... they don't want to do that because it hurts profit margins. MvV> 4) And last but not least; what happened to that pioneer spirit that MvV> made Fidonet sysops try out and help further develop new technologies? I'm really not sure that exists much any more. I do understand what you mean, and experienced it myself back in FidoNet in the 1990's. Nowadays though, we are saturated with new technology every day, and it isn't nearly as exciting as it used to be, because we've gotten used to rapid advances in tech and capabilities. It's become just routine now. MvV> Hope this helps. It actually did. Thanks for taking the time to explain it. ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message. === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115) SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 120 16/0 18/0 19/37 103/705 104/117 105/81 106/201 SEEN-BY: 123/0 25 130 180 755 3001 3002 124/5016 128/187 129/14 135/0 SEEN-BY: 135/115 220 240 363 366 385 390 391 142/104 153/757 7715 SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 110 201/0 203/0 218/700 220/6 221/0 1 6 222/2 226/30 SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426 428 470 616 664 700 705 SEEN-BY: 230/0 240/1120 5832 250/1 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 SEEN-BY: 280/5555 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/119 219 319 SEEN-BY: 320/2119 322/757 762 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1 902/26 3634/0 12 56 57 SEEN-BY: 3634/60 5020/400 545 PATH: 135/115 3634/12 222/2 263/1 280/464 221/1 320/219 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]