Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1394  |
|  Dumas Walker to KURT WEISKE  |
|  Re: Synchronet and IREX  |
|  10 Jul 21 09:41:00  |
 TZUTC: -0400 MSGID: 1347.irex@1:2320/105 254fd020 REPLY: 1147.irex@1:218/700 254b7fa3 PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/dcb003099 Dec 31 2020 GCC 7.5.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.12-Linux master/dcb003099 Dec 31 2020 GCC 7.5.0 BBSID: CAPCITY2 CHRS: ASCII 1 > -=> Utopian Galt wrote to All <=- > UG> is there compatablity with IREX and Synchronet hubs yet? > I have a couple of downlinks running IREX, apparently you included. :) > I see a nag in the error log about the formatting of IREX reporting it's > Bink version compatibility but otherwise it seems to work. Same here re: the error message and "seems to work." I am not aware of a compatability issue beyond the warning message. * SLMR 2.1a * For tomorrow I diet . . . --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 14/0 15/0 16/0 19/36 90/1 105/81 106/201 116/18 SEEN-BY: 120/331 340 123/130 131 129/305 135/0 153/7715 203/0 218/700 SEEN-BY: 221/0 222/2 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 452 550 700 SEEN-BY: 229/1016 1017 230/150 152 240/1120 5411 5832 5853 249/206 SEEN-BY: 249/317 250/1 261/38 100 1466 266/512 267/155 275/100 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 282/1056 291/100 111 292/854 301/1 317/3 320/119 219 319 SEEN-BY: 322/0 757 340/400 341/66 342/200 396/45 633/280 640/1321 SEEN-BY: 712/848 801/161 189 2320/0 105 195 304 3634/12 5020/1042 PATH: 2320/105 261/38 320/219 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]