>  JD> I thought I read someplace that Irex has some proprietory code 
 >  JD> (licensend or permission to use) that cannot be distributed as 
 >  JD> open source.
 >
 > that's possible... in which case, those libraries can be left out 
 > and the code will fail to compile until they are replaced...

 JD> And that may be a problem. 

why? once one knows the name of the missing routines, they can either be
replaced or recreated... it may even be that there's already a replacement
library for the commercial one that was used...

either way, the missing routines /can/ be replaced if they are truly
necessary...

)\/(ark

--- 
 * Origin:  (1:3634/12.42)