-=> Bo Simonsen wrote to Michiel van der Vlist <=-

 BS> Yeah.. but not that I like this situation but I really think something
 BS> serious must happen before the ISPs are being forced to use IPv6 on
 BS> wide-spread basis.

I'm waiting for home routers to build in IPV6/IPV4 gateways - the network 
can go IPV6, people will still have a NAT-ed private class C address on the 
inside. It doesn't get the user any of the perks of a full IPV6 network,
(like getting rid of NAT) but it's cheap and easy to implement. I can 
imagine the ISPs pushing something like this instead of opening up the 
network.

	kurt weiske | kweiske at realitycheckbbs dot org
	            | http://realitycheckbbs.org


... "Proximity alert. Must be coming up on something." 
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
 * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | information is power. (1:218/700)