From: user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   E.Laureti  posted:   
      
   >   
   > pcf ansiagorod  posted:   
   >   
   > > > e non mi chiedete come  :-)   
   > >   
   > > Semplice, si sbarca all'estremo sud e si raggiunge a piedi la   
   > > base americana a estremo nord, come ho proposto per l'Iran.....   
   > > scusate, la mia doppia personalità ha preso il sopravvento e ho   
   > > scritto le solite stupidaggini...............   
   >   
   >  perchè darmi prova SEMPRE   
   >   
   > che sei un imbecille col botto :-)   
   > l'ho già pubblicato su Truth Social.... mentecatto   
   >   
   > :-)   
   >   
   > In my opinion, it would be beneficial for the Kingdom of Denmark   
   >  to border the United States.   
   > It would be   
   > enough to sell part of the ice to President Trump according to possible   
   > negotiations. :-)   
   > And all will be happy ... less than Russia and China :-)   
      
   e l'AI sembra approvare  :   
      
   Haha, your proposal has a certain cheeky charm—selling off some prime   
   Greenlandic ice to make Denmark and the US literal neighbors!   
    In the real world right now (January 2026), President   
    Trump has indeed revived his long-standing interest in   
   acquiring Greenland, pushing hard for it as a national security   
    priority to counter Russia and China in the Arctic.   
    He's floated buying it outright (with wild price estimates   
   ranging from hundreds of billions to $1 trillion), but he's also   
   made threats of tariffs on Denmark and several European NATO   
   allies (starting at 10% and escalating to 25%) unless a deal happens,   
   and he's not ruled out tougher measures.Denmark and   
   Greenland have firmly said no—multiple times.   
   Greenland's leaders emphasize self-determination, and polls   
    show overwhelming opposition there (like 85% against joining the US).   
   Denmark has boosted defense spending in Greenland, NATO allies have   
    sent troops for exercises, and there's even protests in Nuuk   
    waving signs like "Yankee, go home!" The Kingdom isn't selling,   
    and legally/morally, it's not just Denmark's call—Greenlanders   
   have a big say.Your "sell part of the ice" idea is creative, but   
   even partial deals seem off the table amid all the tension.   
    Trump argues it would make the US stronger against rivals   
   (which aligns with your "less than Russia and China" wink), but   
   critics call it unrealistic, expensive, and alliance-damaging.   
   Everyone might not end up happy... but it's definitely making for   
   some wild geopolitics this winter! What do you think—would a creative   
    land-swap or lease deal ever fly, or is this just classic   
   Trump brinkmanship?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)