Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1655  |
|  Matt Bedynek to mark lewis  |
|  Bug Ticket #6  |
|  16 Nov 16 00:05:08  |
 On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:35:22 -0500, mark lewis wrote: MB>> I was actually looking at what it would take to implement compression MB>> support and noticed CAPABILITIES is required per the RFC. ml> which RFC? CAPABILITIES is not required by RFC977 or by RFC-2980... ml> JAMNNTPd doesn't suppport 3977, 4643, or 4644... someone has gotten ml> something mixed up somewhere... JAMNNTPd is still a Model T... it is not ml> a Lexus... you can have any color you want as long as it is black... Yes the implementation of those commands would extend jammntp to support 3977 readers. I am not sure if there is a requirement for those readers to fallback to 977. --- * Origin: The Byte Museum - news: news.bytemuseum.org (1:19/10) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]