Hello Björn,

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 17:37:34 +0100, Björn Felten -  Nicholas Boel wrote:
 NB>> So, I see in the configuration file that echomail.jam is indeed
 NB>> supported. But, how and were the hell does netmail come into play?
 NB>> Apparantly there is no netmail.jam support? Or does netmail get place
 NB>> into the echomail.jam file? I didn't scour the docs about it, but.. it
 NB>> seemed pretty obvious as other softwares seem to support both formats.

 BF>     I must admit that I don't understand shit of what you are talking
 BF> about above. echomail.jam? netmail.jam?

Files created for your tosser to read. This way the tosser doesn't have to
attempt to scan out every single area you have. But rather JamNNTPd creates a
file with the specific echo/net areas you actually posted to. With this, your
tosser can be run with a switch that will ONLY scan out the areas specified in
that file. In JamNNTPd's case, it uses echomail.jam. In HPT's case, it uses
echotoss.log. So I needed a converter so HPT would be able to work nicely with
JamNNTPd in this regard.

 BF>     I have some 100 or so different *.JAM here, one for every echo. Plus
 BF> of course one for netmail:

 BF> !NETMAIL     A 2:203/2    s:\fido\areas\NETMAIL

*.JAM? I don't think we're referring to the same thing. Your JAM areas (4
files per echo) do not have the *.JAM extension. :)

Regards,
Nick

--- slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
 * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (1:154/10)