REPLY: 39.fido_jamnntpd@1:135/371 219e2925
MSGID: 2:221/360 5d3bf8fa
CHRS: LATIN-1 2
TZUTC: 0300
TID: hpt/w64-mvcdll 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08
Hi Eric.

24 Jul 19 20:08:30, you wrote to me:

 ER>   Re: The latest official release
 ER>   By: Tommi Koivula to Fabio Bizzi on Tue Jul 23 2019 05:21 pm

 TK>> Have you tried SmapiNNTPd? Compiles and runs nice in 64bit LInux. :)

 ER> Nice! I just made my CentOS 7.6 smapinntpd.spec to compile it and am
prepping
 ER> to try it out myself.

+1

 ER> One thing I noted was that somewhere it said not to use hpt pack, which I
 ER> understand that's only packing netmail, per hpt docs.

Yes, there's nothing wrong with packing jamnntpd netmail. :)

 ER> I wonder if this'll be any problem with sqpack...... Since it's being
 ER> mentioned about packing netmail already can be problematic. ;)

You can pack and purge message bases as long as you make sure the messages do
not get renumbered. I studied this some time ago. One of the husky programs,
hptutil or sqpack, is ok to pack squish base but not jam. I cannot remember
which one. :)

'Tommi

---
 * Origin: rbb.fidonet.fi (2:221/360)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/17 227/114 229/354
SEEN-BY: 229/426 452 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 280/464 5003 5555 310/31
SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200
PATH: 221/0 1 280/464 229/426