Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2018  |
|  Tommi Koivula to Paul Quinn  |
|  Empty to field with all nntp readers  |
|  12 Aug 19 12:59:30  |
 MSGID: 2:221/6.0 5d513882 REPLY: 3:640/1384.125 5d512dce PID: JamNNTPd/Cygwin32 1.3 20190811 CHRS: UTF-8 2 TZUTC: 0300 On 12.08.2019 12:13, Paul Quinn : Tommi Koivula : > Hi! Tommi, > > On 08/12/2019 06:42 PM, wrote: > > TK> "Paul Quinn : (none)" wrote:you > TK> ==== > TK> Congratulations! You can do it also! > > Yes. Even with the old T'Bird... > >> --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 > TK> Thunderbird/31.4.0 > > I'm not happy with it. It leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Indeed. And why it is happening only in one certain Fabio's base? > All things considered I would hunt for a better solution. The newer > JamNNTPd versions cannot be trusted. Nor can attempting 64bit > compilations. Heck, even the original basic SMAPI version cannot be > either, as warned by Johan in his documentation; it was a test version > of itself. > > I would still be content with 32bit compiles operating in a vBox VM. > They haven't failed me yet. I have three JamNNTPd's running in 32bit systems. They all work fine. OS/2, compiled with the good old GCC 3.2.1 Windows server 2003, compiled with Cygwin GCC version 5.4.0 Raspberry PI2, compiled with gcc version 5.4.0 It would be nice to have a real programmer to get JamNNTPd work in 64bit OS. :) 'Tommi --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 eaMonkey/2.49.4 * Origin: nntps://fidonews.mine.nu - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/6.0) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/1 6 242 360 226/17 227/114 229/275 SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 452 1014 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 280/464 5003 SEEN-BY: 280/5555 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 PATH: 221/1 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]