MSGID: 3:640/1384.125 5d5494a0
REPLY: 2:335/364 5d54387a
PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1
CHRS: UTF-8 2
TZUTC: 1000
TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
Hi! Fabio,

On 08/15/2019 02:36 AM, you wrote:
 FB> Il Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:59:30 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Paul Quinn ha
 FB> scritto:


 >> I have three JamNNTPd's running in 32bit systems. They all work fine.

 FB> OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system, Cthulhu
 FB> accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D

Crikey-Moses!  You're not having any good luck.  If it's your own compile, and
you're actually replying to Tommi's message, then your JamNNTPd is not
honouring the Fidonet bits.  That's something I noticed in a previous message
too.

When I looked around for a binary back in 2011 to run in Xubuntu/32 10.04 LTS,
I put aside the newly-compiled binary and went back to using an older project
I did in Puppy Liunx 4.12 (Linux 2.6.xx).  It worked... properly.

I was also using Puppy-compiled binaries for CrashMail (before FMail32/lnx),
rather than new compiles.  They work especially well in 32bit VMs too.

Can I interest you in some old favourites?

Cheers,
Paul.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
 * Origin: So where the bloody hell are you?!? (3:640/1384.125)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 242 360 226/17 227/114
SEEN-BY: 229/275 354 426 452 1014 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 640/305
SEEN-BY: 640/1321 1384 3634/12
PATH: 640/1384 221/1 280/464 229/426