Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2038  |
|  Tommi Koivula to Paul Quinn  |
|  Empt field wld with all nntp readers  |
|  15 Aug 19 08:28:08  |
 MSGID: 2:221/360 5d54ed60 REPLY: 3:640/1384.125 5d5494a0 PID: JamNNTPd/Linux-RPi/IPv6 1.3 20190814 CHRS: UTF-8 2 TZUTC: 0300 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-08-13 > FB> OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system, > FB> Cthulhu accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D > > Crikey-Moses! You're not having any good luck. If it's your own > compile, and you're actually replying to Tommi's message, then your > JamNNTPd is not honouring the Fidonet bits. That's something I noticed > in a previous message too. I just noticed that there is no ^AREPLY kludge in his message. > When I looked around for a binary back in 2011 to run in Xubuntu/32 > 10.04 LTS, I put aside the newly-compiled binary and went back to using > an older project I did in Puppy Liunx 4.12 (Linux 2.6.xx). It worked... > properly. Can you tell me how to compile 32bit executable in 64bit Linux ? (Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.4.0-159-generic x86_64)) Or if I compile jamnntpd in 32bit i386 system, will it run in 64bit x86_64 linux? 'Tommi, linux-newbie. --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbir * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/1 6 242 360 226/17 227/114 229/275 SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 452 1014 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 280/464 5003 SEEN-BY: 280/5555 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 PATH: 221/1 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]