home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 2038 
 Tommi Koivula to Paul Quinn 
 Empt field wld with all nntp readers 
 15 Aug 19 08:28:08 
 
MSGID: 2:221/360 5d54ed60
REPLY: 3:640/1384.125 5d5494a0
PID: JamNNTPd/Linux-RPi/IPv6 1.3 20190814
CHRS: UTF-8 2
TZUTC: 0300
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-08-13

>  FB> OK, this is a 32 bit jamnntpd server running on a 64 bit system,
>  FB> Cthulhu accept my sacrifice and let the TO field populated! :D
>
> Crikey-Moses!  You're not having any good luck.  If it's your own
> compile, and you're actually replying to Tommi's message, then your
> JamNNTPd is not honouring the Fidonet bits.  That's something I noticed
> in a previous message too.

I just noticed that there is no ^AREPLY kludge in his message.

> When I looked around for a binary back in 2011 to run in Xubuntu/32
> 10.04 LTS, I put aside the newly-compiled binary and went back to using
> an older project I did in Puppy Liunx 4.12 (Linux 2.6.xx).  It worked...
> properly.

Can you tell me how to compile 32bit executable in 64bit Linux ?
 (Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS (GNU/Linux 4.4.0-159-generic x86_64))

Or if I compile jamnntpd in 32bit i386 system, will it run in 64bit
x86_64 linux?

'Tommi, linux-newbie.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbir
 * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/1 6 242 360 226/17 227/114 229/275
SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 452 1014 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 280/464 5003
SEEN-BY: 280/5555 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200
PATH: 221/1 280/464 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca