MSGID: 2:221/1.0 65d98ad6
REPLY: 1:16/101 65d98430
PID: JamNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 m32 mxo 20240221
CHRS: LATIN-1 2
TZUTC: 0200
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-02-05
On 24.02.2024 7:44, Nil Alexandrov wrote:

>
> Merge jamnntpd and smapinntpd repos
>
> I assume that everybody here is using the smapi version, am I right?

Wrong. :)

> Though, the jamnntpd is based on the most recent jamlib which is
> 32/64bit compatible. Cause I remember time when I could do a shortcut by
> passing -m32 flag to gcc to overcome the 64bit issues in the code.

I have compiled the current jamnntpd version after fixes of Carlos and
some of my own. Both 64bit with -m32 and real 32bit linux work now
pretty ok.

> What is the point to use the jamnntpd version today, when you could just
> use the modern Jam+Squish+MSG nntpd version?

Indeed..

> For those who prefer the old fashion jamnntpd, and I appreciate their
> decision, we could just put #ifdef jamlib VS SMAPI to make just one
> source repo and accumulate all recent patches in one place. Sounds cool?

Sounds cool. Go ahead!

'Tommi

---
 * Origin: jamnntpd/lnx (2:221/1.0)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 135/225
SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 242 360 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/8125
SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81
SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400
SEEN-BY: 5054/30
PATH: 221/1 280/464 460/58 229/426