TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240503
TZUTC: 0300
CHRS: UTF-8 4
BBSID: KCO
RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
NOTE: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/115.10.1
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240419
REPLY: 1:154/10 663659be
MSGID: 2:221/6.0 66365ef0
On 04.05.2024 15:52, Nicholas Boel wrote:

> On Sat, 4 May 2024 23:48:18 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:
>
>  TK> I think I've got it ok now. ;)
>
> That's good. I was worried about you for a second there. ;)

Sorry. ;D

> BTW, is "@RFC-User-Agent:" a better choice over "NOTE:" according to
> some such standards I don't care to read? I've noticed you recently
> changed this.

I wanted to "log" something from nntp client to kludges. So NOTE was changed
to what the client sends.. Just for testing..

X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.10
X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

'Tommi

--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240503
 * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 135/220
SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 840 221/0 1
SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66
SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280
SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 5020/400 1042 5054/30
PATH: 221/6 341/234 280/464 460/58 229/426