Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 2586  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Tommi Koivula  |
|  Re: nonbsp update  |
|  05 May 24 12:46:52  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240423 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: CP850 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20240306 MSGID: 2:280/464 6637642d REPLY: 2:221/1.1 663717fd Hi Tommi, On 2024-05-05 08:24:13, you wrote to Nicholas Boel: >> Or is this something you've just done yourself because FMail adds a >> RFC-X-NO-ARCHIVE kludge? TK> Nothing to do with FMail. Actually I cannot find anything like that in TK> fmail docs or in the code. It indeed has nothing to do with FMail. TK> Maybe it is the GoldED of Wilfred that is adding that kludge. ;) That is true. >> From Wikipedia: >> >> "The proper field to prevent a message from being archived is: >> X-No-Archive: Yes (abbreviated as "XNAY")." >> >> So I imagine what FMail is doing, isn't actually preventing messages >> from being archived. TK> In the fidonet, probably not. I have no illusions about that. It's incase my messages are gated to newsgroups in some of the fido areas... Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240423 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 135/220 SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 SEEN-BY: 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 5054/30 PATH: 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]