MSGID: 1:154/10 6637772c
REPLY: 2:280/464 6637642d
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux 2.4.5
CHRS: UTF-8 4
TZUTC: -0500
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-02-05
On Sun, 5 May 2024 17:46:52 +0200, Wilfred Van Velzen -> Tommi Koivula wrote:

 WvV> It indeed has nothing to do with FMail.

 TK>> Maybe it is the GoldED of Wilfred that is adding that kludge. ;)

 WvV> That is true.

Thank you for clarification, however *what* was adding that kludge wasn't
really the point.

 >>> From Wikipedia:

 >>> "The proper field to prevent a message from being archived is:
 >>> X-No-Archive: Yes (abbreviated as "XNAY")."

 >>> So I imagine what FMail is doing, isn't actually preventing messages
 >>> from being archived.

 WvV> I have no illusions about that. It's incase my messages are gated to
 WvV> newsgroups in some of the fido areas...

Right, but the question is (after reading that wiki site, and finding no
reference to said prefix), is if the newsgroup software(s) are looking for an
"X-NO-ARCHIVE" or an "RFC-X-NO-ARCHIVE" header field. According to the above,
adding the "RFC" prefix would cause the search for the proper header field to
fail, as would the rest of the ones Tommi has changed. That's why I asked.

Regards,
Nick

... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
 * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/616 123/10 124/5016
SEEN-BY: 128/260 135/220 225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 40 50 700 203/0
SEEN-BY: 218/700 220/90 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206
SEEN-BY: 229/317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124
SEEN-BY: 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400 5054/30
PATH: 154/10 280/464 460/58 229/426