TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240504
TZUTC: 0300
CHRS: CP437 2
RFC-User-Agent: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
PID: JamNNTPd/Linux32/IPv6 ubi386 20240505
REPLY: 1:154/10 6637772c
MSGID: 2:221/6.0 6637be62
Nicholas Boel wrote:

NB> Right, but the question is (after reading that wiki site, and
NB> finding no reference to said prefix), is if the newsgroup software
NB> (s) are looking for an "X-NO-ARCHIVE" or an "RFC-X-NO-ARCHIVE"
NB> header field. According to the above, adding the "RFC" prefix would
NB> cause the search for the proper header field to fail, as would the
NB> rest of the ones Tommi has changed. That's why I asked.

If some news archive software is searching for "X-NO-ARCHIVE", it might
be happy to find "RFC-X-NO-ARCHIVE". :)

'Tommi

--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240504
 * Origin: jamnntpd/lnx (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 135/220
SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 840 221/0 1
SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 426 428 470
SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66
SEEN-BY: 341/200 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 1042 5054/30
PATH: 221/6 341/66 280/464 460/58 229/426