TID: FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240423
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: CP850 2
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20240306
MSGID: 2:280/464 6637ec1b
REPLY: 1:154/10 6637772c
Hi Nicholas,

On 2024-05-05 07:10:28, you wrote to me:

 NB> Right, but the question is (after reading that wiki site, and finding
 NB> no reference to said prefix), is if the newsgroup software(s) are
 NB> looking for an "X-NO-ARCHIVE" or an "RFC-X-NO-ARCHIVE" header field.
 NB> According to the above, adding the "RFC" prefix would cause the search
 NB> for the proper header field to fail, as would the rest of the ones
 NB> Tommi has changed. That's why I asked.

I don't remember the details from when I started using it. It was recommended
to add it this way...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.3-B20240423
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 135/220
SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/8125
SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120
SEEN-BY: 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 5054/30
PATH: 280/464 460/58 229/426