home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 10099 
 qadronhuark@geemail.com to All 
 Re: Ubuntu Server 6.06LTS - video mode 
 27 Feb 07 07:05:32 
 
Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.co
!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-o
line.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Hadron 
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Server 6.06LTS - video mode
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:05:31 +0100
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <87lkijerg4.fsf@geemail.com>
References: 
 
 
 <87wt25q702.fsf@geemail.com>
 
 <45E369BE.E1FD9497@yahoo.com> <87k5y4hrs1.fsf@geemail.com>
 <45E418B2.5981D72F@yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: individual.net iE3NWE2/woZV0bOCsASsawJGHr4jV/yd4sxYTVqNoMlnizOMks
X-Orig-Path: news.individual.net!news
X-Face:  2h#||Cd#d%F*NCm59[_6/{1a@jy%;|j>{D~4^gKg(^i%7j0IK?+,/GmW&:CD5fEKb_!
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XVdcvSmP55hh7Hcw3St0bUUItu4=
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.os.linux.ubuntu:11138

CBFalconer  writes:

> Hadron wrote:
>> CBFalconer  writes:
>>> SmoothJazz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's not in Gnome or KDE since Ubuntu server has no GUI.  Just the
>>>> default terminal I get once Ubuntu server boots up...
>>>>
>>>> I don't even have Gedit - so I will try VI on my menu.lst (after
>>>> backing it up first).
>>>
>>> Please don't top-post.  Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
>>> with) the material you quote, after snipping anything irrelevant to
>>> the reply.  See the following links:
>> 
>> What links? How many times do you have to be reminded that many news
>> readers are configured to snip signatures? If you are going to net nanny
>> then at least do it right yourself.
>
> If your alleged reader snips sigs it is faulty.  If it snips sigs
> from replies only, it is helpful.

wrong. It is not faulty. Or "alleged". It is configured to do it because
of the plethora of overly long sigs in existence these days. As are many
others. Gnus even has features to tone down the font so you can hardly
see them. Basically if you have advice give it, don't point to net nanny
signatures. In the same way you gripe about no context, it is the
same. Sure, you could fetch the parent article but I agree its a pain
not to have context and might mention it occasionally.

And besides, if the OP was to reply to you, and cut your signature, then
the point is still valid - readers who read the reply will NOT see your
links.

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Omicron Theta BBS (1:261/20)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca