Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 7249  |
|  Maurice Kinal to Benny Pedersen  |
|  glibc crypt changes  |
|  23 Aug 21 13:59:11  |
 
REPLY: 2:230/0 61236dcf
MSGID: 1:153/7001 6123a9af
CHRS: UTF-8 4
-={ 2021-08-23 13:59:11.913528662+00:00 }=-
Hey Benny!
BP> unless its static-linked, but in this case here its not imho,
Exactly. I definetly would have know if I statically linked it in, which I
don't even have at the moment.
BP> i only spoted that slackware is have pam in
I noticed that too. I haven't done anything with pam lately and am not sure I
ever will. I may call it quits on the gcc-11.2.0/glibc-2.33/linux-5.13.12 I
am currently calling a stable root/boot. As far as shadow is concerned I am
stuck at 4.8.2 and no pam dependency.
Speaking of which I have the newest shadow-4.9 on a glibc-2.34 partition that
I have yet to test boot. Maybe later today. shadow-4.9 doesn't appear to
work on a glibc-2.33 based system for some unknown reason to me at the moment.
Life is good,
Maurice
... Wide ne biþ wel, cwæþ se þe gehyrde on helle hriman.
Things are bad everywhere, said the man who heard wailing in hell.
--- GNU bash, version 5.1.8(1)-release (x86_64-motorshed-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 30/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 114/709 120/340 123/131
SEEN-BY: 129/305 134/100 153/105 135 757 802 6809 7001 154/10 218/700
SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 702 229/424 426 428 452 550 616 700
SEEN-BY: 229/1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 400 261/38 267/67
SEEN-BY: 280/464 282/464 1038 292/854 301/0 1 101 113 812 317/3 322/757
SEEN-BY: 335/364 341/66 342/200 460/58 633/280 712/848 920/1 4500/1
SEEN-BY: 5058/104
PATH: 153/7001 757 221/6 301/1 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]