REPLY: 2:423/39 6302724f
MSGID: 1:153/7001.2989 63027513
CHRS: UTF-8 4
TZUTC: -0000
Hey Karel!

 KK> I think yes. I used to like them more than RaspB

I don't care much for raspi's.  They all lack a decent wireless connection and
usb is too flakey to be counted on.  I am not sure if manufacturers understand
the universal part of USB.

 KK> This Ubuntu LTS was unbeatable that time.

Hm.  Depending on what we're talking about, I believe I was and still can do
better.  However I haven't seen any arm based systems of interest to me which
probably explains why I am using x86_64's.  They have much better expansion
possibilities albiet are more costly than a typical arm64 as well as a much
greater power consumption for the x86_64s.  For me - actually mostly for the
neighbours - it is the wireless connectivity that determined the desirable
hardware to make it work and that definetly costs both for hardware as well as
power consumption.

It is a case of you get what you pay for.

Life is good,
Maurice

... Fidonet 4K - Sweet Sixteen Penguins of the Apocalypse.
--- GNU bash, version 5.1.16(1)-release (x86_64-znver2-linux-gnu)
 * Origin: One of us @ (1:153/7001.2989)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 114/709 120/340 123/131
SEEN-BY: 124/5016 129/305 331 134/100 153/135 141 757 7001 7715 154/10
SEEN-BY: 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 6 227/114 229/111 112 113 206 317 400
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 428 452 470 550 616 664 700 240/5832 266/512
SEEN-BY: 267/67 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/789 854 8125 301/1 310/31
SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 410/9
SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5020/545
PATH: 153/7001 757 280/464 292/854 229/426